Please wait a minute...

道教義理 ›› 2025 ›› 1 ›› 139-153

• 道教義理與跨領域研究 •    下一篇

反思黑格爾對於道教的定位

包淩崢   

  • 作者簡介: 包淩崢,浙江臺州人,復旦大學哲學學院博士研究生,研究方向為:馬克思主義中國化、存在論(本體論)與近現代德國哲學。

Reflection on Hegel's Positioning of Taoism

Bao Lingzheng   

  • About author: Bao Lingzheng, a native of Taizhou, Zhejiang, is a doctoral candidate at the School of Philosophy, Fudan University. His research focuses on the Sinicization of Marxism, ontology, and modern German philosophy.

提要: 黑格爾按照從直接性和自然性向概念性和精神性發展的基本原則,來為世界歷史上的各大主要宗教類型排序,並據此指出道教等中國宗教的局限性在於,絕對威力和有限主體框架下,精神概念的不充分性,或偶然性、有限性和外在性。「道」被把握為概念性的「度」,道教修行被視為抽象而孤獨的自我沉思。黑格爾的體系建構受制於高度的歐洲理性主義立場,難以體認到中國文化語境下,「道」的非實體性和非意識對象屬性,以及具身性、體悟性和生命化特性。但是,黑格爾宗教哲學的形而上學基礎探究到了實體層次上,思維範疇的存在和非存在之間的統一性,這和道教重玄學對有無之中的體悟,有著潛在的會通之可能。

關鍵字: 黑格爾;道教;道;宗教哲學;重玄學

Abstract: Hegel ranks the major religious types in world history according to the basic principle of development from directness and naturalness to conceptuality and spirituality. Based on this, he points out that the limitations of Chinese religions such as Taoism lie in the inadequacy of the spiritual concept, or contingency, finitude and externality within the framework of absolute power and the limited subject. The "Tao" is grasped as the conceptual "measure", and Taoist cultivation is regarded as an abstract and lonely self-contemplation. Hegel's system construction is restricted by a highly Euro-rationalist stance, making it difficult to recognize the non-substantial and non-conscious object attributes of the "Tao" in the context of Chinese culture, as well as its characteristics of embodiment, comprehension and vitalization. However, the metaphysical foundation of Hegel's philosophy of religion explores the unity between being and non-being of the thinking category at the level of substance, which potentially has the possibility of convergence with the understanding of the existence and non-existence in Taoist Chongxuan (the profound mystery) thought.

Key words: Hegel; Taoism; Tao; Philosophy of Religion; Chongxuan (the profound mystery) thought