Please wait a minute...

道教義理 ›› 2025 ›› 2 ›› 105-112

• 重玄學專題研究 •    下一篇

成玄英之「理」的重玄學闡釋

宋嘉清   

  • 作者簡介: 宋嘉清,女,江西贛州人,現爲華中科技大學哲學學院博士研究生,研究方向爲:道家道教。

Cheng Xuanying’s Chongxuan Interpretation of “Principle”

Song Jiaqing   

  • About author: Song Jiaqing, female, is from Ganzhou, Jiangxi Province. She is currently a PhD candidate at the School of Philosophy, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Her research interests focus on Daoist philosophy and Daoism.

提要: 成玄英作爲唐代重玄學的主要人物,其思想特色在於以「理」釋「道」來構建其重玄 學體系。面對魏晉玄學「有無」之爭及佛教思想的挑戰,成玄英提出「道者,虛通之妙理」,「虛」 是「理」無形卻實存的本體特性;「通」是「理」沒有滯礙的作用方式,並通過「理」與「事」對 舉,賦予「理」本體意義。其次,他以「自然」作爲「理」的具體內涵和重玄終旨,「自然之理」 既有「通生萬物」的普遍性,還有「正眾生之性」的規範性,強調「心證自然之理」方能「窮原徹 際,妙極重玄」,指出「偏滯之人,未能會理」的困境。最後,成玄英將「理」最終落實到修養層 面,以「遣二偏之執」,再遣「一中之藥」的方法達致「窮理盡性」的理想境界,從而實現本體論 到心性論的過渡,爲唐宋以後的內丹心性學奠定了基礎。

關鍵字: 成玄英;重玄學;理;理本

Abstract: As a key figure in Tang Dynasty Chongxuan Daoism, Cheng Xuanying’s intellectual distinctiveness lies in his construction of a Chongxuan system by interpreting the “Dao” through the concept of “Principle” (理, li).Confronting the Wei-Jin Neo-Daoist debates on “Being and Non-being” and challenges posed by Buddhist thought,Cheng proposed that “the Dao is the sublime Principle of emptiness and flow”.Here,“emptiness”( 虚, xu) denotes the formless yet substantively existent ontological characteristic of “Principle”,while “flow”( 通, tong) describes its mode of functioning without obstruction.By juxtaposing “Principle” with “phenomena”( 事, shi),Cheng endowed “Principle” with ontological significance.Furthermore,he identified “spontaneity” as the concrete connotation of “Principle” and the ultimate aim of Chongxuan. The “Principle of Spontaneity” embodies both the universality of “generating all things comprehensively” and the normativity of “rectifying the nature of all beings”. Cheng emphasized that only by "mentally realizing the Principle of Spontaneity" can one “exhaust the origin and penetrate the limits, sublimely reaching the culmination of Chongxuan”. He also pointed out the predicament of “biased and obstructed individuals being unable to comprehend Principle.” Finally,Cheng Xuanying applied “principle” at the practical level of self-cultivation.Through the method of “discarding the two biases ” and subsequently relinquishing “the remedy of a centered oneness”, one attains the ideal state of “exhausting Principle and fulfilling nature”.This approach facilitates the transition from ontology to mind-nature theory,laying the groundwork for the Inner Alchemy and mind-naturetheory that flourished after the Tang and Song dynasties.

Key words: Cheng Xuanying;Chongxuan studies;Principle(理);Principle as foundation(理本)