Please wait a minute...

道教義理 ›› 2025 ›› 1 ›› 12-27

• 道教義理學研究 •    下一篇

從信仰本位出發:試述中國道教義理學的過去與現在

萬明旭   

  • 作者簡介: 萬明旭,江西南昌人,工商管理博士,現為《道教義理》執行主編,《江西道教》編輯主任,海峽道教學院教師,研究方向為:道教義理、華嚴學

From the Perspective of Faith-based Perspective: An Exploration of the Past and Present of Chinese Taoist Doctrinal Studies

Wang Mingxu   

  • About author: Wan Mingxu, holding a Doctor of Business Administration, currently serves as Executive Editor of Daoist Doctrines and Teachings, Editor-in-Chief of Jiangxi Taoism, and Lecturer at Straits Taoist College. His research directions are Taoist doctrines and Huayan studies.

提要: 道教義理學是基於信仰本位闡釋其宗教體系的學問,含名相詮釋與系統教義理論。東漢道教義理學以《老子想爾注》為萌芽階段,初期受「三教合一」影響接納佛教義理,形成名相融合的道教義理文化性格;南朝道教開始構建義理本位語詞系統,借注疏、義解等形式展開義理活動,北朝《無上秘要》形成道教義理體系框架;隋唐道教義理學因系統性綜合論述道教義理文獻及以成玄英、李榮為代表的重玄思潮而走向成熟,具備與佛教媲美的思辨性;晚唐以後道教義理學受戰亂、焚經等因素影響,長期中斷。近現代道教義理學在教界、學界推動下復興,形成「教界+學界」互動雛形。但存教界主體長期缺位、信仰體驗與理論闡釋脫節,及佛教術語吸收遭「抄襲」誤解等問題。未來需道教界从信仰本位出發,構建道教義理學互動機制,並結合信仰體驗、宗教多元論對現有相關爭議予以回應。

關鍵字: 道教義理學;道教信仰本位;道教教理教義;佛道關係;宗教多元論

Abstract: Taoist doctrinal studies is a discipline that interprets its religious system from a faith-based perspective. It encompasses the interpretation of terminologies and systematic doctrinal theories. In the Eastern Han Dynasty, Taoist doctrinal studies was in its embryonic stage with Laozi Xiang er Zhu (Laozi Xiang’er Commentary). In the initial period, influenced by the concept of "the integration of the Three Teachings," it adopted Buddhist doctrines, forming a cultural character of integrated terminologies in Taoist doctrines. During the Southern Dynasties, Taoism began to construct a doctrine-oriented terminological system and carried out doctrinal activities through forms such as annotations and exegeses. In the Northern Dynasties, Wushang Miyao (The Supreme Secret Essentials) formed the framework of the Taoist doctrinal system. In the Sui and Tang Dynasties, Taoist doctrinal studies matured due to systematic and comprehensive discussions of Taoist doctrinal literature and the Chongxuan (Twofold Mystery) ideological trend represented by Cheng Xuanying and Li Rong, showing a speculative power comparable to that of Buddhism. After the late Tang Dynasty, Taoist doctrinal studies suffered a long-term interruption due to factors such as wars and the burning of scriptures. In modern times, Taoist doctrinal studies has been revived with the promotion of the Taoist religious community and the academic circle, forming an embryonic interaction between the "Taoist religious community + academic circle." However, problems such as the long-term absence of the Taoist religious community as the main body, the disconnection between faith experiences and theoretical interpretations, and the misinterpretation of the absorption of Buddhist terms as "plagiarism" still exist. In the future, the Taoist religious community needs to start from a faith-based perspective, construct an interactive mechanism for Taoist doctrinal studies, and respond to existing controversies by combining faith experiences and religious pluralism.

Key words: Taoist Doctrinal Studies;Taoist Faith-based Perspective;Buddhist-Taoist Relations;Religious Pluralism