Please wait a minute...
《道教義理》期刊官網

道教義理 ›› 2025 ›› 1 ›› 154-169

• 書評、綜述與訪談 •    下一篇

對中國哲學的存有學研究：偏重存在的居有 ——評《道家與道教思想史批判——一種現象學神學研究》

陳逸舟；余群   

  • 作者簡介: 陳逸舟，福建漳州人，浙江越秀外國語學院本科生，研究方向為：現象學和宗教哲學；余群：江西樟樹人，博士，現為浙江越秀外國語學院教授，研究方向為：美學、中國哲學（陽明心學為主）、文藝理論。

Ontological Study of Chinese Philosophy: Emphasizing the Appropriation of Being—A Review of?Critique of Daoist and Taoist Intellectual History: A Phenomenological-Theological Inquiry

Cheng Yizhou; Yu Qun   

  • About author: Chen Yizhou, a native of Zhangzhou, Fujian, is an undergraduate student at Zhejiang Yuexiu University of Foreign Languages. His research interests focus on phenomenology and religious philosophy. Yu Qun, a native of Zhangshu, Jiangxi, is a PhD holder and currently a professor at Zhejiang Yuexiu University of Foreign Languages. Her research areas include aesthetics, Chinese philosophy (predominantly Wang Yangming's mind philosophy), and literary theory.

PDF (PC)

提要： 文章建立在《道教批判》的基礎上，以對其現象學神學的範式還原為基礎，回歸到存有學的源發的領域上，通過對存有之本現的建基構建其源發的範式「存有-宗教」，以存有源發的是非、差別和純全存在的兩種存在屬性的領會為存有與存在的中介，在「存有-宗教」的基礎上進入到存有之本現性未明的存在中構建「存在-宗-教」的研究範式，同時以對「是非」和「存在」兩種存在屬性的偏重得到兩套生存論建構和現象學神學考察的視角（範式），在範式完備的基礎上進入對《道教批判》所闡述的「中國」根柢的「道教」的研究，在存有學的基礎上消解了「老子」與「莊子」的對立性問題，且以對「中國」的生存論建構的梳理，澄明瞭中國哲學展開的本質形式「莊儒合道」，以對「中國」的生存論建構的回歸梳理、說明了「由老及莊」的內在自然的邏輯的本質展開。

關鍵字: 中國哲學史；存有；宗教觀念；老莊

Abstract: This article builds on *Critique of Taoism*, grounding itself in a paradigmatic reduction of its phenomenological theology to return to the originary domain of ontology. By founding and constructing the originary paradigm of "Being-Religion" based on the establishment of the fundamental manifestation of Being, it uses the understanding of the two existential attributes of Being—i.e., the right-wrong dichotomy, differentiation, and pure Being—as a mediator between Being and existence. On the basis of the "Being-Religion" paradigm, it enters the unilluminated existence of Being's fundamental manifestation to construct the research paradigm of "Existence-Religion-Teachings." Meanwhile, by emphasizing the two existential attributes of "right-wrong" and "existence," it obtains two sets of perspectives (paradigms) for existential construction and phenomenological theological investigation. With a complete paradigm, it engages in the study of the "Taoism" rooted in "China" as expounded in *Critique of Taoism*, resolving the oppositional problem between "Laozi" and "Zhuangzi" from an ontological perspective. Through sorting out the existential construction of "China," it clarifies the essential form of Chinese philosophy's development—"the integration of Zhuangzi, Confucianism, and Taoism"—and through returning to and sorting out the existential construction of "China," it illustrates the essential unfolding of the inherent natural logic of "from Laozi to Zhuangzi."

Key words: History of Chinese philosophy;Being-Religion;Religious concepts; Laozi and Zhuangzi (Lao-Zhuang philosophy)